These are all quite amusing. This tacks onto the tail end of a conversation that has long been going on on this blog: the “he is either real or he is…” conversation. The list is now quite extensive. To summarize it plainly, I am either what I claim to be, or I have a breadth of experience that is considerable (if only because it goes to the point you make about reality). Many have tried to dissect what I seem to be and present notions of what is truly most probable: that I am a team of experts, that I am an artificial intelligence, that I am a person who literally sits at the google all day and night, and so forth. I am sure it is very possible any of these are true. But are they likely? That is not a question for me, but for you.
That is the point.
I know it perturbs some to constantly be referred back to the body of my published work, but you see, in this instance, I am not simply referencing my own annoyance at repeating myself, and am speaking to the point. You will see precisely why my species is no threat to you, why I have ceased to care, why the authorities don’t bother me, and why I get by with only minor hindrances. You will also see the audience and how this is all marketed and prefaced and protected by contract law. To the world at large, legally and morally, it is all fiction. What a lovely hiding place.
I have protected myself very well. But that is also why I fight back when perturbed. Because I know what will happen when I have to stop this, and what ending the experiment will mean. I have put the safeguards in place. I know what will change when I enact them. I do not like the idea, but if it must be done, so be it.
I hope this answers the implied question.
Actually the issue here is that I think you just threatened his species and a veiled threat to call the cops on him, when he hasn’t even done anything. Wow. Just like wtf.